Healthy Living Books Books
welcome to the Healthy Living Bookshop, here you will find a great resource for Books for the whole family.
Books : Bad Science .
Rating: 
- An excellent book
I have enjoyed Ben Goldacre's colum in the Guardian for some time. I initially thought his book was going to be simply a collection of those articles; it is far more than that. What a compelling and comprehensive account he gives of the the nature of evidence-based medicine. Thank goodness there is at least someone "out there" willing, and eminently able, to identify and shame the hucsters, snake-oil salesmen and lazy journalists so wonderfully nailed in this book. It is a book to make you angry. It is a book to tell your friends about. It is a book that should be in every school library. Providing children with an understanding of how and why evidence-based medicine developed, what life was like before it did, and how to assess the health-claims made by the day-time sofa-fillers and assorted self-styled health gurus, should form part of the National Curriculum (teachers could perhaps create some space in the day by ditching Brain Gym....). Ben, thank you.
Rating: - Outstanding, and the ideal companion is.....
Great book. The case is made with exemplary clarity and wit. Rather than repeat what others have said more than adequately, let me simply recommend, as dessert, Jamie Whyte's "Bad Thoughts". This holds to flawed logic the same mirror Ben Goldacre holds to bad science.
With both volumes digested, nearly every press story I read triggers in my head the solitary thought of Douglas Adams' ill-fated bowl of petunias: "Oh no - not again!".
Rating: - Frightening and compulsory read
Best read I have had for a good few months.
I got hold of a copy of the book during Christmas and finished it within 3 days. Coming from a science background, I can only say that I cannot treat the misinformation, manipulation and exploitation by the media and pharmcueticals described by Dr. Goldacre as 'light-hearted science'. Some of those things he mentioned regarding statistical methods and reporting are common problems for any science research, albeit not always used by companies to seek profits. It throws me into despair.
I recommend this book to anyone, especially to those who are supposed to promote public understanding of science - there are so much they could have done and yet haven't.
Rating:
- the appliance of science
Following on from his Guardian column of the same name Ben Goldacre, a doctor and journalist, has published Bad Science, where he attempts to engage us in the science that we are all subjected to and persuaded by on an almost daily basis. He is not a happy man. Not so much because people get things wrong, or portray them inaccurately but because the science behind it isn't really that complex. In fact the revelation of this book is not so much that he lays into some soft targets like Gillian McKeith ('or, to give her full medical title: Gillian McKeith') or homeopathy, giving us all a giggle along the way, but that he attempts to arm us all with the basic scientific tools that will help us to smell a rat. After all, most of what we get now in the press and on the television is statistics and we all know that there are lies, damn lies and then there are statistics.
When I was about 13 at school I once convinced my class that red apples could give you cancer. Having learnt the word 'carcinogenic' I was able to use that a few times along with pigment and sound terribly convincing even though every word was absolute nonsense. It turns out that my skills would also have qualified me to be an excellent nutritionist (a title which after all requires no actual qualifications). McKeith is taken to task here for portraying herself as a bonafide medical authority, making very sciencey sounding statements and peppering her books with sciencey looking reference numbers, underneath which there are some fairly glaring and basic scientific errors. Some digging behind her credentials makes things a little clearer. All of which is grist to the mill for someone like me who has always had a dislike of her and her humiliation tactics. If you want some ammunition against 'the awful poo lady' then look no further.
I have also had a personal experience of homeopathy (before I really understood what it all was). I had a touch of the man-flu, was given a pill and told to go to bed with my clothes on, pull the duvet over my head and sweat it out (the pill would aid this by opening the capillaries and aiding blood flow right to the skin's surface). When I woke in the morning after a hot night I felt fine, great in fact and put it all down to the pill. This is the beauty of the placebo. If you believe in the pill, it might just do the trick (which is a gross simplification of the cultural significance of the placebo - explained in much greater detail by Goldacre). It is the fact that the placebo is so interesting a phenomenon, worthy of attention and study, rather than the new-agey sounding nonsense about the 'memory' of water explaining how a substance which has been so diluted as to contain not one molecule of the original substance could have any medical benefit (beyond that of the placebo), which really gets his goat. If homeopathy was to come clean and present itself as a benign resource like horoscopes and crystal dowsing then it might just get away with it but when you read about someone like Peter Chapell, a homeopath who has developed a remedy that can be used to treat the HIV virus, or Matthias Rath who claimed his vitamin treatments could do the same (and who recently dropped his libel case against The Guardian), it makes me think very dark thoughts.
I was really interested to read this book because of the final chapter on the MMR vaccine. Being a young parent means that you are literally bombarded with information, advice, statistics, theories and good old-fashioned fearful paranoia and I'll admit that my steadfast rational approach to just about everything had encountered a little wavering when it came to making a decision that could impact on someone else's life. Goldacre doesn't exactly come out and say it but by calling the chapter The Media's MMR Hoax and showing that after several years of scare-mongering there is no evidence to support a link between the jab and autism, he helped put the issue to bed for me.
The role of the media is a large focus of the book unsurprisingly and it is almost gobsmacking to see how poorly researched, written and constructed some of the stories we have all read really are. The fact that the results which fuelled the MRSA superbug stories came from a poorly qualified man, out of depth and working out of his garden shed would be funny if it weren't so serious (especially given his untimely death from a car accident shortly after the facts of the matter were exposed). The pressure on journalists to provide stories with punchy headlines and stats that have impact leads to a fudging of the numbers, very basic and very misleading mistakes. The pressure on papers to maintain advertising revenue means that articles which should really be written by science correspondents are given to lifestyle or comment writers who don't use the science writers at their disposal to check the science. That's why it might be worth checking out the Bad Science website next time you read that cocaine use amongst schoolchildren has doubled or that you should be drinking gallons of purple grape juice due to its high level of antioxidants.
Science can be complex, but bad science is often pretty simple. Goldacre's book is eye-opening and provocative whilst always attempting to be fair rather than personally vindictive (well, he almost pulls that one off). It could have been better ordered, powered as it is by the digressive and slightly chaotic energy of a self-confessed geek but what's refreshing is that he credits his readers with some intelligence and places the ball firmly in our court.
Rating: - One of the best books I've read for a whole
I found this book interesting, informative and a little scary. Ben Goldacre's calm, patient list of the crimes against science and by extension humanity perpetuated by the alternative medicine and pharmacological industries, as well as the media's own aptitude for distorting the view of science in the popular eye, is a gripping, sometimes funny, often terrifying read. Strongly recommend this book.
- An excellent bookI have enjoyed Ben Goldacre's colum in the Guardian for some time. I initially thought his book was going to be simply a collection of those articles; it is far more than that. What a compelling and comprehensive account he gives of the the nature of evidence-based medicine. Thank goodness there is at least someone "out there" willing, and eminently able, to identify and shame the hucsters, snake-oil salesmen and lazy journalists so wonderfully nailed in this book. It is a book to make you angry. It is a book to tell your friends about. It is a book that should be in every school library. Providing children with an understanding of how and why evidence-based medicine developed, what life was like before it did, and how to assess the health-claims made by the day-time sofa-fillers and assorted self-styled health gurus, should form part of the National Curriculum (teachers could perhaps create some space in the day by ditching Brain Gym....). Ben, thank you.
Rating:
- Outstanding, and the ideal companion is.....Great book. The case is made with exemplary clarity and wit. Rather than repeat what others have said more than adequately, let me simply recommend, as dessert, Jamie Whyte's "Bad Thoughts". This holds to flawed logic the same mirror Ben Goldacre holds to bad science.
With both volumes digested, nearly every press story I read triggers in my head the solitary thought of Douglas Adams' ill-fated bowl of petunias: "Oh no - not again!".
Rating:
- Frightening and compulsory read Best read I have had for a good few months.
I got hold of a copy of the book during Christmas and finished it within 3 days. Coming from a science background, I can only say that I cannot treat the misinformation, manipulation and exploitation by the media and pharmcueticals described by Dr. Goldacre as 'light-hearted science'. Some of those things he mentioned regarding statistical methods and reporting are common problems for any science research, albeit not always used by companies to seek profits. It throws me into despair.
I recommend this book to anyone, especially to those who are supposed to promote public understanding of science - there are so much they could have done and yet haven't.
Rating:
- the appliance of scienceFollowing on from his Guardian column of the same name Ben Goldacre, a doctor and journalist, has published Bad Science, where he attempts to engage us in the science that we are all subjected to and persuaded by on an almost daily basis. He is not a happy man. Not so much because people get things wrong, or portray them inaccurately but because the science behind it isn't really that complex. In fact the revelation of this book is not so much that he lays into some soft targets like Gillian McKeith ('or, to give her full medical title: Gillian McKeith') or homeopathy, giving us all a giggle along the way, but that he attempts to arm us all with the basic scientific tools that will help us to smell a rat. After all, most of what we get now in the press and on the television is statistics and we all know that there are lies, damn lies and then there are statistics.
When I was about 13 at school I once convinced my class that red apples could give you cancer. Having learnt the word 'carcinogenic' I was able to use that a few times along with pigment and sound terribly convincing even though every word was absolute nonsense. It turns out that my skills would also have qualified me to be an excellent nutritionist (a title which after all requires no actual qualifications). McKeith is taken to task here for portraying herself as a bonafide medical authority, making very sciencey sounding statements and peppering her books with sciencey looking reference numbers, underneath which there are some fairly glaring and basic scientific errors. Some digging behind her credentials makes things a little clearer. All of which is grist to the mill for someone like me who has always had a dislike of her and her humiliation tactics. If you want some ammunition against 'the awful poo lady' then look no further.
I have also had a personal experience of homeopathy (before I really understood what it all was). I had a touch of the man-flu, was given a pill and told to go to bed with my clothes on, pull the duvet over my head and sweat it out (the pill would aid this by opening the capillaries and aiding blood flow right to the skin's surface). When I woke in the morning after a hot night I felt fine, great in fact and put it all down to the pill. This is the beauty of the placebo. If you believe in the pill, it might just do the trick (which is a gross simplification of the cultural significance of the placebo - explained in much greater detail by Goldacre). It is the fact that the placebo is so interesting a phenomenon, worthy of attention and study, rather than the new-agey sounding nonsense about the 'memory' of water explaining how a substance which has been so diluted as to contain not one molecule of the original substance could have any medical benefit (beyond that of the placebo), which really gets his goat. If homeopathy was to come clean and present itself as a benign resource like horoscopes and crystal dowsing then it might just get away with it but when you read about someone like Peter Chapell, a homeopath who has developed a remedy that can be used to treat the HIV virus, or Matthias Rath who claimed his vitamin treatments could do the same (and who recently dropped his libel case against The Guardian), it makes me think very dark thoughts.
I was really interested to read this book because of the final chapter on the MMR vaccine. Being a young parent means that you are literally bombarded with information, advice, statistics, theories and good old-fashioned fearful paranoia and I'll admit that my steadfast rational approach to just about everything had encountered a little wavering when it came to making a decision that could impact on someone else's life. Goldacre doesn't exactly come out and say it but by calling the chapter The Media's MMR Hoax and showing that after several years of scare-mongering there is no evidence to support a link between the jab and autism, he helped put the issue to bed for me.
The role of the media is a large focus of the book unsurprisingly and it is almost gobsmacking to see how poorly researched, written and constructed some of the stories we have all read really are. The fact that the results which fuelled the MRSA superbug stories came from a poorly qualified man, out of depth and working out of his garden shed would be funny if it weren't so serious (especially given his untimely death from a car accident shortly after the facts of the matter were exposed). The pressure on journalists to provide stories with punchy headlines and stats that have impact leads to a fudging of the numbers, very basic and very misleading mistakes. The pressure on papers to maintain advertising revenue means that articles which should really be written by science correspondents are given to lifestyle or comment writers who don't use the science writers at their disposal to check the science. That's why it might be worth checking out the Bad Science website next time you read that cocaine use amongst schoolchildren has doubled or that you should be drinking gallons of purple grape juice due to its high level of antioxidants.
Science can be complex, but bad science is often pretty simple. Goldacre's book is eye-opening and provocative whilst always attempting to be fair rather than personally vindictive (well, he almost pulls that one off). It could have been better ordered, powered as it is by the digressive and slightly chaotic energy of a self-confessed geek but what's refreshing is that he credits his readers with some intelligence and places the ball firmly in our court.
Rating:
- One of the best books I've read for a wholeI found this book interesting, informative and a little scary. Ben Goldacre's calm, patient list of the crimes against science and by extension humanity perpetuated by the alternative medicine and pharmacological industries, as well as the media's own aptitude for distorting the view of science in the popular eye, is a gripping, sometimes funny, often terrifying read. Strongly recommend this book.
We have also partnered with Amazon and are able to provide a very wide selection of New and Used Books for sale. Please browse our extensive collection and take advantage of our great discounts and savings offered. Books : Bad Science
